Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCui, Boyu
dc.contributor.authorChen, Lejun
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Nan
dc.contributor.authorShchipanov, Anton
dc.contributor.authorDemyanov, Vasily
dc.contributor.authorRong, Chunming
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-02T11:51:29Z
dc.date.available2024-01-02T11:51:29Z
dc.date.created2023-06-07T09:46:35Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationCui, B.; Chen, L.; Zhang, N.; Shchipanov, A.; Demyanov, V.; Rong, C. (2023) Review of Different Methods for Identification of Transients in Pressure Measurements by Permanent Downhole Gauges Installed in Wells. Energies, 16(4), 1698en_US
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3109306
dc.description.abstractPermanent downhole gauges (PDG) are massively installed in injection and production wells operated in different industries such as oil and gas, geological CO2 storage, and the geothermal industry. These gauges provide a vast amount of real-time pressure measurements. The pressure measurements may be divided into periods with a predominantly monotonic change of pressure in response to a sudden change of rate, called transients. These transients are caused by well operations, such as variation of injection or production rate and well shut-ins. Transient identification is one of the important steps in processing and interpreting the PDG data. Traditional transient identification is performed by processing and analyzing with human involvement, which is a step in post-operation well analysis. In modern well surveillance technology, permanent and reliable data transmission from the wellbore to the surface provide the possibility to analyze well performance in real time or proactively. So automated transient identification is a practical demand, but a challenge at the same time. This article starts with the definition of a transient, then reviews and compares seven methods for transient identification proposed by previous works available in the literature. A comparative analysis of these methods is carried out accounting for the detection algorithm and procedure, results of testing, and general positive and negative sides of performance and application of these methods. The results of this review facilitate further developments of field data interpretation techniques by the R&D community and academia and may help in the selection of a proper method for further application in well surveillance workflows developed in the industry.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectpressure transient analysisen_US
dc.titleReview of Different Methods for Identification of Transients in Pressure Measurements by Permanent Downhole Gauges Installed in Wellsen_US
dc.title.alternativeReview of Different Methods for Identification of Transients in Pressure Measurements by Permanent Downhole Gauges Installed in Wellsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© by the author(s) 2023en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Andre berg- og petroleumsfag: 519en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Other subjects within rock and petroleum sciences: 519en_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US
dc.source.volume16en_US
dc.source.journalEnergiesen_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/en16041689
dc.identifier.cristin2152478
dc.source.articlenumber1689en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal