Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFiguera, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorIrusta, Unai
dc.contributor.authorMorgado, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorAramendi, Elisabete
dc.contributor.authorAyala, Unai
dc.contributor.authorWik, Lars
dc.contributor.authorKramer-Johansen, Jo
dc.contributor.authorEftestøl, Trygve
dc.contributor.authorAlonso-Atienza, Felipe
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-30T11:53:35Z
dc.date.available2017-05-30T11:53:35Z
dc.date.issued2016-07
dc.identifier.citationFiguera, C. (2016) Machine learning techniques for the detection of shockable rhythms in automated external defibrillators. Plos One, 11(7): e0159654nb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2443860
dc.description.abstractEarly recognition of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and electrical therapy are key for the survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients treated with automated external defibrillators (AED). AED algorithms for VF-detection are customarily assessed using Holter recordings from public electrocardiogram (ECG) databases, which may be different from the ECG seen during OHCA events. This study evaluates VF-detection using data from both OHCA patients and public Holter recordings. ECG-segments of 4-s and 8-s duration were analyzed. For each segment 30 features were computed and fed to state of the art machine learning (ML) algorithms. ML-algorithms with built-in feature selection capabilities were used to determine the optimal feature subsets for both databases. Patient-wise bootstrap techniques were used to evaluate algorithm performance in terms of sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp) and balanced error rate (BER). Performance was significantly better for public data with a mean Se of 96.6%, Sp of 98.8% and BER 2.2% compared to a mean Se of 94.7%, Sp of 96.5%and BER 4.4% for OHCA data. OHCA data required two times more features than the data from public databases for an accurate detection (6 vs 3). No significant differences in performance were found for different segment lengths, the BER differences were below 0.5-points in all cases. Our results show that VF-detection is more challenging for OHCA data than for data from public databases, and that accurate VFdetection is possible with segments as short as 4-s.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherPublic Library of Sciencenb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectventricular fibrillation (VF)nb_NO
dc.subjectout-of-hospital cardiac arrestnb_NO
dc.subjecthjerteinfarktnb_NO
dc.subjectautomated external defibrillatorsnb_NO
dc.subjectautomatisert defibrillatornb_NO
dc.titleMachine learning techniques for the detection of shockable rhythms in automated external defibrillatorsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holder© 2016 Figuera et al.nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Kardiologi: 771nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teknologi: 500::Informasjons- og kommunikasjonsteknologi: 550nb_NO
dc.source.volume11nb_NO
dc.source.journalPlos Onenb_NO
dc.source.issue7nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0159654


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal