Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKallesten, Emanuela Iedidia
dc.contributor.authorZimmermann, Udo
dc.contributor.authorMadland, Merete Vadla
dc.contributor.authorBertolino, Silvana R.A.
dc.contributor.authorOmdal, Edvard
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Pål Østebø
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-15T19:03:00Z
dc.date.available2021-08-15T19:03:00Z
dc.date.created2021-05-03T15:02:57Z
dc.date.issued2021-05
dc.identifier.citationKallesten, E.I., Zimmerman, U., Madland, M.V. et al. (2021) Mineralogy and geochemistry of reservoir and non-reservoir chalk from the Norwegian continental shelf. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 205, 108914en_US
dc.identifier.issn0920-4105
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2767848
dc.description.abstractA first and detailed study of the geochemistry and mineralogy characterizing the North Sea reservoir and non-reservoir chalk is provided in this work. The study is based on 185 cores from exploration and development wells in the North Sea. The cores related to reservoir development have different flooding status – unflooded or waterflooded at various temperatures – and are directly sampled from the Ekofisk field. Optical petrography shows a micritic carbonate matrix, with grains represented by various microfossils such as foraminifers and sponge spicules. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) reveals post-depositional calcite precipitation and cementation. Dolomite is found only in the reservoir samples, but it is discussed as a diagenetic feature, unrelated to the hydrocarbon content or EOR exposure. The non-carbonate minerals observed with BSE-SEM and XRD include mostly quartz but also smectite, illite, kaolinite, mica, and pyrite. The abundance of clastic input varies, and there is a clear decrease in porosity stratigraphically downwards, with stronger cementation and higher compaction. δ13C reflects primary trends for Upper Cretaceous stages while δ18O in all samples is lower than the secular global isotopic values for this period. However, the δ18O values are not sufficiently low to imply a strong diagenetic overprint, but rather suggest the influence of a secondary fluid. This fluid cannot be a hydrocarbon-rich one, nor EOR fluids, as non-reservoir samples, as well as flooded and unflooded reservoir samples show very similar stable isotope values.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectpetroleumsteknologien_US
dc.subjectEORen_US
dc.titleMineralogy and geochemistry of reservoir and non-reservoir chalk from the Norwegian continental shelfen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Author(s).en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teknologi: 500::Berg‑ og petroleumsfag: 510::Petroleumsteknologi: 512en_US
dc.source.volume205en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Petroleum Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108914
dc.identifier.cristin1907819
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 230303en_US
dc.source.articlenumber108914en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal