Safety climate and safety culture in health care and the petroleum industry : psychometric quality, longitudinal change, and structural models
Original version
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669870902812271Abstract
This thesis presents four empirical studies of safety climate and one
study of a safety culture programme. Four aims were defined to guide
the conducted work: 1) assess safety climate in health care and
petroleum and evaluate the psychometric properties of instruments
used; 2) study the stability versus changeability of safety climate over
time; 3) investigate the possibility of identifying a common safety
climate structural model in health care and petroleum; and 4) improve
knowledge about the dynamics and effects of safety culture
programmes through development and testing of a structural model.
Longitudinal designs were used to assess safety climate in both
specialised health care and among workers on offshore platforms over a
two-year period. In addition, cross-sectional data were explored to
investigate the possibility of a common safety climate model in
specialised health care and petroleum. A mixed method design was
used to develop and validate a structural model that could illustrate the
dynamics of a safety culture programme implemented in a large
petroleum company.
Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC), developed by
Sorra and Nieva (2004), was translated into Norwegian and used to
assess safety climate at a large regional hospital in two measurement
waves. A new instrument—Norwegian Offshore Risk and Safety
Climate Inventory (NORSCI)—was similarly used to assess safety
climate on the Norwegian continental shelf during two measurement
waves. Two-year intervals were used between measures.
The psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of HSOPSC and
NORSCI were considered valid and satisfactory for both
measurements. Results from the hospital suggest that the safety climate
level was relatively stable during the measurement period, indicating
that implemented improvement efforts have had relatively little impact
on safety climate dimensions. Three safety climate dimensions were
improved, two were reduced, and five had no significant change. On
the continental shelf, four safety climate scores improved during the
period, while one dimension was lowered.After adaptations, development, and validations of comparable safety
climate concepts based on HSOPSC, factor analysis revealed six
identical cross-industrial measurement concepts that could be used to
develop a common structural model in health care and petroleum: 1)
learning, feedback, and improvement; 2) teamwork within units; 3)
supervisor/manager expectations and actions promoting safety; 4)
transitions and teamwork across units; 5) organisational management
support for safety; and 6) stop working in dangerous situations. A
structural model assessment supported the hypothesised structural links
specified among these dimensions—namely, safety climate variables at
higher organisational levels influenced safety behaviour via safety
climate dimensions at lower organisational levels. However, this model
could only be generalised to fit health care and offshore petroleum
workers, not onshore petroleum workers.
To explore the dynamics of a safety culture programme, a mixed
method approach was adopted using qualitative interviews, fieldwork,
and a questionnaire survey. Five measurement concepts were validated
and incorporated into a hypothetical structural model: 1) participation
in a two-day kickoff; 2) effectiveness of programme implementation; 3)
personal programme commitment; 4) safety behaviour change; and 5)
safety culture change. The final model developed illustrates in
particular how the levels of personal programme commitment and
effectiveness of programme implementation influence the level of
change regarding safety behaviour and safety culture. Another finding
was that participation in the two-day kickoff had both positive and
negative influences due to the high expectations developed among
workers. Safety behaviour change influenced safety culture change and
vice versa, which was also hypothesised.
Description
Publisher
University of Stavanger, NorwaySeries
PhD thesis UiS74