Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.advisorAadnøy, Bernt Sigve
dc.contributor.authorSævareid, Monika
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-26T08:54:10Z
dc.date.available2017-10-26T08:54:10Z
dc.date.issued2017-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2462294
dc.descriptionMaster's thesis in Petroleum engineeringnb_NO
dc.description.abstractDrilling in high-pressure high-temperature (HPHT) wells present many economical, technical and operational challenges. The wells are usually located in deep water¬¬¬––where the total well cost and trip times are increased. Well planning of these wells require special considerations of three factors: safety, efficiency and cost. The production string is one of the most important aspects of well planning in HPHT wells. A failure of the production string may have disastrous results, since the string serves as the backup protection for the tubing. The selection of a long casing string versus a liner tieback string is a common discussion in the oil industry. Several factors have to be accounted for prior to the final selection. The liner option will for instance provide more barriers against annular flow, but it is also a more complex and time-consuming operation to perform. Long casing string solution provides better well integrity over the lifetime of a well, but is dependent upon a successful primary cement job. It is easier to achieve a successful primary cement job with the liner than with the long casing string. The space between the casing and drill pipe is much bigger when running in hole with the liner, which will generate less surge pressure and open up for a higher flow rate during the cement job. The high flow rate during cementing, normally improves the quality of the cement job. In HPHT wells there is in general tighter clearance in the operating drilling window. Proper control of Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD) is of major importance when it comes to drilling safely and efficient. Liner provides reduced ECD, resulting in less risk for losses both while running in hole and cementing. Although the liner comes with several advantages, the long string option is operationally easier and is less time consuming. My opinion is that long string option is the preferred one, assuming that the formation strength is sufficient for the cement job.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherUniversity of Stavanger, Norwaynb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMasteroppgave/UIS-TN-IPT/2017;
dc.subjectpetroleumsteknologinb_NO
dc.subjectpetroleum engineeringnb_NO
dc.subjectHPHTnb_NO
dc.subjectcementingnb_NO
dc.subjectlinernb_NO
dc.subjecttieback stringnb_NO
dc.subjectproduction casing designnb_NO
dc.subjectfull string production casingnb_NO
dc.subjectlinernb_NO
dc.titleSelection of Long or Short Production Casing on HPHT Wellsnb_NO
dc.typeMaster thesisnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teknologi: 500::Berg‑ og petroleumsfag: 510::Petroleumsteknologi: 512nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel