Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCrewdson, K.
dc.contributor.authorLockey, David
dc.contributor.authorRøislien, Jo
dc.contributor.authorLossius, Hans Morten
dc.contributor.authorRehn, Marius
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-05T11:25:42Z
dc.date.available2018-04-05T11:25:42Z
dc.date.created2017-03-14T16:21:12Z
dc.date.issued2017-02
dc.identifier.citationCrewdson, K. et al. (2017) The success of pre-hospital tracheal intubation by different pre-hospital providers: a systematic literature review and meta-analysisnb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1466-609X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2492823
dc.description.abstractBackground: Pre-hospital basic airway interventions can be ineffective at providing adequate oxygenation and ventilation in some severely ill or injured patients, and advanced airway interventions are then required. Controversy exists regarding the level of provider required to perform successful pre-hospital intubation. A previous meta-analysis reported pre-hospital intubation success rates of 0.849 for non-physicians versus 0.991 for physicians. The evidence base on the topic has expanded significantly in the last 10 years. This study systematically reviewed recent literature and presents comprehensive data on intubation success rates. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed using PRISMA methodology to identify articles on pre-hospital tracheal intubation published between 2006 and 2016. Overall success rates were estimated using random effects meta-analysis. The relationship between intubation success rate and provider type was assessed in weighted linear regression analysis. Results: Of the 1838 identified studies, 38 met the study inclusion criteria. Intubation was performed by non-physicians in half of the studies and by physicians in the other half. The crude median (range) reported overall success rate was 0.969 (0.616–1.000). In random effects meta-analysis, the estimated overall intubation success rate was 0.953 (0.938–0.965). The crude median (range) reported intubation success rates for non-physicians were 0.917 (0.616–1.000) and, for physicians, were 0.988 (0.781–1.000) (p = 0.003). Discussion: The reported overall success rate of pre-hospital intubation has improved, yet there is still a significant difference between non-physician and physician providers. The finding that less-experienced personnel perform less well is not unexpected, but since there is considerable evidence that poorly performed intubation carries a significant risk of morbidity and mortality careful consideration should be given to the training and experience required to deliver this intervention safely.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBioMed Centralnb_NO
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectcritical carenb_NO
dc.subjectakuttmedisinnb_NO
dc.subjectendotrakeal intuberingnb_NO
dc.subjectendotrakeal intubasjonnb_NO
dc.subjectairway managementnb_NO
dc.subjectpre-hospital emergency carenb_NO
dc.titleThe success of pre-hospital tracheal intubation by different pre-hospital providers: a systematic literature review and meta-analysisnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holder© The Authors. 2017nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700nb_NO
dc.source.volume21nb_NO
dc.source.journalCritical Carenb_NO
dc.source.issue31nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13054-017-1603-7
dc.identifier.cristin1458347
cristin.unitcode217,13,0,0
cristin.unitnameDet helsevitenskapelige fakultet
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal