Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.advisorOveland, Nils Petter
dc.contributor.authorHaaland, Karin
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-18T09:43:12Z
dc.date.available2019-01-18T09:43:12Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-15
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2581248
dc.descriptionMaster's thesis in PreHospital Critical Carenb_NO
dc.description.abstractBackground and aim: Endotracheal intubation is performed to secure the airway in patients who require mechanical ventilation. Uncontrolled extubation is a life-threatening event and endotracheal tubes (ETTs) need to be secured to prevent this hazardous event. In this study, we compare the fixation strength of non-specialized versus specialized ties. Method: A simulation mannequin was intubated and the ETTs fixated using four different ties; tape, tube tie, Thomas Tube Holder™ and the T2 Wrap™. The trial consisted of three parts: a pull test, a jerk test and a user test. The pull and jerk tests were repeated 10 times per device, while the user test was performed by 10 experienced paramedics that intubated and fixated the ETTs using all four different devices/ties in a simulated scenario with cardiac arrest. After fixation, weights (i.e. 1-10 Kg dumbbells) were applied to all the tubes in incremental steps (i.e. pull test and user test) or with a 25 cm drop (i.e. jerk test). The main outcome measure was millimeter tube displacement out of the mouth. Secondary outcomes were force applied to the tubes (newton), time from laryngoscopy to tube fixation (seconds) and user-friendliness of each device (0 – 100). Results: The T2 Wrap demonstrated superiority in fixation strength for ETTs compared to tape, tube tie and Thomas Tube Holder (p=0,05), in both the pull test and user test. In the jerk test, all ETTs secured with tape immediately snapped out of the airway, all tubes fixated with tube tie moved on average 24.6 mm, all tubes fixated with Thomas Tube Holder 11.8 mm and all tubes fixated with T2 Wrap 6.5 mm, respectively. Paramedics scored the user-friendliness of the specialized ties Thomas Tube Holder and T2 Wrap first and second. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate a superiority of using specialized ties (e.g. Thomas Tube Holder and T2 Wrap) compared to non-specialized ties (e.g. tape and tube tie) for endotracheal tube fixation in a simulated clinical setting. We advocate increased use of these devices to prevent unplanned extubations. Keywords: Endotracheal intubation, endotracheal tube, endotracheal securement device, endotracheal tube fixation, tube fixation device, extubation.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherUniversity of Stavanger, Norwaynb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMasteroppgave/UIS-HV/2018;
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjecthelse- og sosialfagnb_NO
dc.subjectprehospitale tjenesternb_NO
dc.subjectprehospital critical carenb_NO
dc.subjectendotrakeal tubefikseringnb_NO
dc.subjectendotrakeal intubasjonnb_NO
dc.titleComparison of non-specialized versus specialized ties for endotracheal tube fixationnb_NO
dc.typeMaster thesisnb_NO
dc.description.versionsubmittedVersionnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700nb_NO
dc.source.journalBMC Anesthesiologynb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

  • Studentoppgaver (HV) [1304]
    Master- og bacheloroppgaver i sykepleie / spesialsykepleie / helsevitenskap

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal