Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.advisorHansen, Britt Sætre
dc.contributor.authorLarsson, Lena
dc.contributor.authorSilverstone, Pia
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-05T14:06:41Z
dc.date.available2020-08-05T14:06:41Z
dc.date.issued2020-05
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2670982
dc.descriptionMaster's thesis in Critical Care Nursingen_US
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT Introduction: New evidence based practices are continuously introduced in the dynamic, fast changing and highly specialized environment of an Intensive Care Unit. There are a number of theories that predict the possible success of a new implementation and there exist numerous well-documented factors that need to be in place in order for a sustainable change of practice to occur. Despite this it is still difficult to implement new knowledge which is of sustainable use in the ICU. The TALK clinical debriefing tool has recently been introduced in the ICU of a Norwegian university hospital as part of a larger EU funded project based on the World Health Organization’s recommendation that clinical staff use debriefing as a tool to improve patient safety and staff well-being. Aim: The aim of this study is to identify enablers and barriers in the implementation of evience based practices in the ICU, using the implementation of the TALK clinical debrief tool as an example. Methods: A qualitative study: Focus groups and individual interviews with critical care nurses, doctors and nurse managers were performed in an Intensive Care Unit at a Norwegian university hospital. In the analysis Qualitative Content Analysis was applied. Results: The results suggest that, in general, there is a climate and a willingness to change but that it is dependent upon the potential gains for clinical and personal improvement. Further, there must exist an implementation system with a clear follow- up and follow-through plan for a change to become sustainable. Conclusion: There were indications that improvements in organizational implementation planning are needed, including consideration of staff expectations, the perceived need for the change, how the potential change fits in with existing routines and if there are any other major organizational changes which can occur that can create conflict. All of these should be considered when introducing a change.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Stavanger, Norwayen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMasteroppgave/UIS-HV/2020;
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjecthelse- og sosialfagen_US
dc.subjectimplementationen_US
dc.subjectevidence- based practiceen_US
dc.subjectcritical care nursesen_US
dc.subjectintensive careen_US
dc.subjectPARIHSen_US
dc.subjectTALK clinical debriefen_US
dc.subjectICUen_US
dc.subjectspesialsykepleieen_US
dc.subjectintensiv sykepleieen_US
dc.subjectintensive care nursesen_US
dc.titleWhy do some implementations of new evidence-based knowledge succeed, while others are quickly forgotten? A qualitative study of implementation processes in an ICU.en_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Sykepleievitenskap: 808en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

  • Studentoppgaver (HV) [1305]
    Master- og bacheloroppgaver i sykepleie / spesialsykepleie / helsevitenskap

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal