| dc.description.abstract | Over the last two (2) decades, there has been a surge in scholarly attention and a lot has been
written on the lethal autonomous weapons systems (also known as “Killer Robot”). The focus of
writing has been on the legal, ethical, moral, and policy issues pertaining to Lethal Autonomous
Weapons System (LAWS). Thus, a lot of attention and concerns have been directed to what
happens when a Lethal Autonomous Weapon System goes wrong? However, little or no attention
has been directed to discussions such what are the risks surrounding the development, deployment,
and use of Lethal Autonomous Weapons System LAWS? How should the international community
including countries address risk regulations of the Lethal Autonomous Weapon System if there
are uncertainties as to how these systems may fail?
This thesis addresses the risks attached to Lethal Autonomous Weapons System, complex, tightly
coupled and unpredictable high-risk technology. As such, the thesis debates the risks to LAWS
from the Normal Accident Theory perspective and the discusses the uncertainty/unpredictability
revolving around LAWS. It goes further to argue whether the high-reliability theory can be used
as means of safety in Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems.
In addition, this thesis addresses the obstacles of LAWS complying with risk regulations. In
discussing that, it argues whether LAWS without human intervention can be said to appear to be
capable of complying with the key principles of risk regulations such as the international
humanitarian law and the laws of armed conflicts principles of proportionality, distinction, and
precaution to bring about societal safety to the community where LAWS is deployed or engaged.
This thesis is expected to direct attention and focus to discussions surrounding the risks of
developing, engaging and deploying LAWS and the obstacles that LAWS presents in complying
with risk regulations that can bring about safety in the use and deployment of LAWS.
Keywords: Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems, Risk, System Failure, Normal Accident
Theory, High Reliability Theory, Safety, Risk Regulations, Weapons Review, Proportionality,
Distinction, Precautionary principle | |
