Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBhardwaj, Sachin
dc.contributor.authorRATNAYAKE MUDIYANSELAGE, Chandima
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-21T13:21:16Z
dc.date.available2022-12-21T13:21:16Z
dc.date.created2020-12-14T09:13:03Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationBhardwaj, S., & Ratnayake, R. C. (2021). Residual stress estimation in defect assessment procedures at weld toe and away locations on girth welds: Review of key parameters. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 111, 102848.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-8442
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3039066
dc.description.abstractThe distribution of residual stresses in welded joints plays an important role within the fracture evaluation guidelines recommended in structural integrity assessment codes such as BS7910, API 579 RP-1/ASME FFS-1 and R6. The residual stress profile recommendations in these standards are based on extensive experimental results and finite element modelling (FEM) based parametric residual stress evaluations at the weld centerline and weld toe positions. The upper bound residual stresses’ profiles based on these recommendations vary significantly from one type of welding process to another for a given weld configuration with identical welding conditions. These fitness-for-service codes (FFS) depict great variability in estimating residual stress profiles during defect assessment, as BS 7910 & R6 recommends a constant profile at a distance away from welds and API 579 provides a single curve for all locations in the axial direction. Thus, conservatism is widely associated with these recommended profiles in fracture potential evaluation and assessments, leading to suboptimal recommendations. In this manuscript, a detailed review is undertaken of residual stress estimation in various FFS codes, showing vast variability among them for locations away from the weld toe on girth welds. Key distinct parameter characteristics, pipe radius to thickness ratio and heat input are detailed and found to have a significant effect on residual stress profiles in structural integrity assessment, using a stress decomposition technique. These recommendations establish an overall analysis of the interrelationship between key parameters, considering a generalized broad range of applications. A framework is proposed, based on the current review, for conducting detailed investigation by employing thermomechanical numerical modelling, coupled with measurement results (nondestructive and semi-destructive) from an experimental study, as input to machine-learning algorithms for application guidance to engineers.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleResidual stress estimation in defect assessment procedures at weld toe and away locations on girth welds: Review of key parametersen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teknologi: 500en_US
dc.source.volume111en_US
dc.source.journalTheoretical and applied fracture mechanics (Print)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102848
dc.identifier.cristin1859305
dc.source.articlenumber10248en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal