Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorXing, Yihan
dc.contributor.authorSantoso, Tan Aditya Dwi
dc.contributor.authorMa, Yucong
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-23T08:24:05Z
dc.date.available2023-01-23T08:24:05Z
dc.date.created2021-12-27T11:12:03Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationXing, Y., Santoso, T. A. D., & Ma, Y. (2022). Technical–economic feasibility analysis of subsea shuttle tanker. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(1), 20.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2077-1312
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3045136
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents the technical and economic feasibility analysis of the subsea shuttle tanker (SST). The SST is proposed as an alternative to subsea pipelines and surface tankers with the primary purpose of transporting CO2 autonomously underwater from onshore facilities to subsea wells for direct injection at marginal subsea fields. In contrast to highly weather-dependent surface tanker operations, the SST can operate in any condition underwater. The technical–economic analysis is performed in two steps. First, the SST’s technical feasibility is evaluated by investigating designs with lower and higher capacities. The purpose is to observe the appearance of technical limits (if present) when the SST is scaled down or up in size. Second, an economic analysis is performed using the well-reviewed cost models from the publicly available Zero Emissions Platform (ZEP) and Maritime Un-manned Navigation through Intelligence in Networks (MUNIN) D9.3 reports. The scenarios considered are CO2 transport volumes of 1 to 20 million tons per annum (mtpa) with transport distances of 180 km to 1500 km in which the cost per ton of CO2 is compared between offshore pipelines, crewed/autonomous tanker ships, and SST. The results show that SSTs with cargo capacities 10,569 m3, 23,239 m3, and 40,730 m3 are technically feasible. Furthermore, the SSTs are competitive for short and intermediate distances of 180–750 km and smaller CO2 volumes of 1–2.5 mtpa. Lastly, it is mentioned that the SST design used the DNVGL Rules for Classification for Naval Vessels, Part 4 Sub-surface ships, Chapter 1 Submarine, DNVGL-RU-NAVAL-Pt4Ch1, which is primarily catered towards military submarine design. It is expected that a dedicated structural design code that is optimized for the SST would reduce the structural weight and corresponding capital expenditure (CAPEX).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleTechnical–Economic Feasibility Analysis of Subsea Shuttle Tankeren_US
dc.title.alternativeTechnical–Economic Feasibility Analysis of Subsea Shuttle Tankeren_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThe authoren_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Teknologi: 500en_US
dc.source.volume10en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Marine Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jmse10010020
dc.identifier.cristin1972163
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal