Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMyhre, Erlend
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-06T09:23:57Z
dc.date.available2014-02-06T09:23:57Z
dc.date.issued2011-06-14
dc.identifier.citationno_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/183608
dc.descriptionMaster's thesis in Petroleum engineeringen_US
dc.description.abstractAs the oil and gas recoverables are getting more inaccessible and harder to procure, the worlds demand for petroleum resources are constantly increasing. This entails the oil industry to expose themselves towards more challenging environments for oil and gas exploitation. To enable for this development to be beneficial, or even feasible, the industry is eagerly on the lookout for innovative solutions to counter for the given challenge. This thesis will elucidate a new drilling technique that mitigates narrow pore-/fracture-pressure windows, wellbore instability, depleted formations, formation damage, excessive casing strings, fatigue life, large water depths and hostile environments. The mitigation of fatigue life on the Gullfaks Satellites (GFS) substructure is one of the main drivers for Statoil to implement this technology in the first instance. The technology, called Riserless Drilling Systems, enables for drilling of the entire well without the need of a large rigid riser. The research focus for this thesis will therefore be to evaluate the methods potential, and to see if it is a viable and adaptive solution for the oil and gas industry. The research methods used for this thesis are an evaluation of the feasibility studies done by the Riserless Drilling System service providers, company visits, data retrieval from relevant sources and some experimental research through the use of the commercial spreadsheet Microsoft Excel. Through careful evaluation of the developing technology, the author is of the opinion that a Riserless Drilling System is a viable solution for the given purpose based on the performed research. The basis for this lies within the already filed proven RMR® technology, and the comprehensive underlying feasibility studies performed. Hence the author concludes, with reservation regarding pump technology, that the conceptual technology will be suitable for the presented water depths. As the water depth on GFS is not of any concern for this technology, it would be a highly potential candidate for the mitigation of further fatigue development on the wellhead systems. Disregarded the cost involved in utilizing a Riserless Drilling System, the author is of the perception that further initiative is beneficial due to its many positive aspects. As a direct result of these, the technology will emerge and may with time become the best alternative to drill a well in the future.en_US
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherUniversity of Stavanger, Norwayno_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMasteroppgave/UIS-TN-IPT/2011;
dc.subjectpetroleumsteknologien_US
dc.subjectboreteknologien_US
dc.subjectdual gradient drillingen_US
dc.subjectriserless drillingen_US
dc.subjectriserless mud recoveryen_US
dc.subjectcuttings transport systemen_US
dc.subjectwellhead fatigueen_US
dc.subjectriser loadsen_US
dc.subjectu-tube effecten_US
dc.subjectwell controlen_US
dc.subjectdisc pumpen_US
dc.subjectdiaphragm pumpen_US
dc.subjectriser marginen_US
dc.subjectocean currentsen_US
dc.titleRiserless Drilling Systemsno_NO
dc.typeMaster thesisno_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel