| dc.contributor.author | Hausken, Kjell | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-08-22T12:46:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-08-22T12:46:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Hausken, K. (2011) ‘Production, safety, fighting, and risk’, International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp.324-329 | no_NO |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/184325 | |
| dc.description | The article was originally published as : Hausken, K. (2011)
‘Production, safety, fighting, and risk’, Int. J. Business Continuity and Risk
Management, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp.324–329. Made available here with permission from Inderscience. | no_NO |
| dc.description.abstract | Two agents make a trade off between production and safety investment, fighting for joint production. Ceteris paribus, if agent 1 has a higher unit cost of production, lower emphasis on safety causes more fighting and higher utility for agent 1, and less production and safety effort by agent 1. | no_NO |
| dc.language.iso | eng | no_NO |
| dc.publisher | Inderscience | no_NO |
| dc.subject | production | no_NO |
| dc.subject | safety investment | no_NO |
| dc.subject | fighting | no_NO |
| dc.subject | risk | no_NO |
| dc.subject | economics | no_NO |
| dc.subject | productive investment | no_NO |
| dc.title | Production, safety, fighting, and risk | no_NO |
| dc.type | Journal article | no_NO |
| dc.type | Peer reviewed | no_NO |
| dc.subject.nsi | VDP::Social science: 200 | no_NO |
| dc.source.pagenumber | 324-329 | no_NO |
| dc.source.volume | 2 | no_NO |
| dc.source.journal | International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management | no_NO |
| dc.source.issue | 4 | no_NO |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1504/IJBCRM.2011.044406 | |
