Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRehnman, Sebastian
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-01T10:45:40Z
dc.date.available2014-04-01T10:45:40Z
dc.date.issued2011-01
dc.identifier.citationRehnman, S. (2011) Graced Response: John Owen on Faith and Reason. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie, 53(4). pp. 431–449nb_NO
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/193430
dc.description.abstractThe issue of faith and reason arises from the claim that there are two kinds of truths: some truths are discoverable to human understanding and some are not. This paper argues that the epistemology of the prominent orthodox protestant theologian John Owen (16161683) does not fit the labels of evidentialism and fideism. According to evidentialism, every cognitive act (including faith) must depend on evidence available to reason. According to fideism, there is no relation between faith and reason so that nothing of reason can be counted for or against faith. But Owen is a fideist in the sense that faith is not based on rational evidence, and an evidentialist in the sense that Christian faith ought to have some rational or cognitive support. Philosophical arguments count in favour of faith and are not the ground of faith. The paper suggests that this nuanced view is a viable alternative and option.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherWalter de Gruyternb_NO
dc.subjectVDP::Humaniora: 000::Teologi og religionsvitenskap: 150nb_NO
dc.subjectJohn Owennb_NO
dc.subjectVDP::Humaniora: 000::Filosofiske fag: 160nb_NO
dc.titleGraced Response: John Owen on Faith and Reasonnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber431-449nb_NO
dc.source.volume53nb_NO
dc.source.journalNeue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophienb_NO
dc.source.issue4nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/NZST.2011.027


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel