Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorThørrisen, Mikkel Magnus
dc.contributor.authorSkogen, Jens Christoffer
dc.contributor.authorKjeken, Ingvild
dc.contributor.authorJensen, Irene
dc.contributor.authorAas, Randi Wågø
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-02T11:43:51Z
dc.date.available2019-07-02T11:43:51Z
dc.date.created2019-06-17T21:54:03Z
dc.date.issued2019-06
dc.identifier.citationThørrisen, M.M., Skogen, J.C., Kjeken, I. et al. (2019) Current practices and perceived implementation barriers for working with alcohol prevention in occupational health services: the WIRUS OHS study. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 14(30)nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1747-597X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2603194
dc.description.abstractBackground Alcohol is associated with detrimental health and work performance outcomes, and one to three out of ten employees may benefit from interventions. The role of occupational health services (OHS) in alcohol prevention has received little attention in research. The primary aims of this study were to explore current practices of alcohol prevention targeting employees in occupational health settings, and examine whether and which perceived implementation barriers were associated with alcohol prevention activity. The secondary aim was to explore whether barriers were differentially associated with primary, secondary and tertiary prevention activities. Methods In this cross-sectional study, survey data were collected from 295 OHS professionals in Norway in 2018. Data were analysed by means of descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, paired samples t-tests, and multivariate linear regression analyses. Results Overall, seven out of ten OHS professionals worked with alcohol-related cases less than monthly, while only one out of ten did so on a weekly basis. Their activities were more focused on tertiary prevention than on primary and secondary prevention. Physicians, psychologists and nurses reported to handle alcohol-related issues more often than occupational therapists and physical therapists. Higher levels of implementation barriers internal to the OHS’ organisation (competence, time and resources) were associated with lower alcohol prevention activity. Barriers external to the OHS’ organisation (barriers concerning employers and employees) were not. This pattern was evident for primary, secondary and tertiary prevention activities. A majority of OHS professionals agreed that employees’ alcohol consumption constitute a public health challenge, and that OHS’ should focus more on alcohol prevention targeting employees. Conclusions Occupational health settings at workplaces may be particularly serviceable for alcohol prevention programmes since the majority of the population is employed and the majority of employees consume alcohol. An increase in overall prevention activity, and a shift from mainly focusing on tertiary prevention to an increased emphasis on primary and secondary prevention, may both hinge on increased training of OHS professionals, emphasising knowledge on the importance of working with alcohol prevention, and training in administering alcohol prevention programmes. Making alcohol prevention a priority may also require increased allocation of time and resources.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherBioMed Centralnb_NO
dc.relation.urihttps://rdcu.be/bHTt4
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectrusnb_NO
dc.subjectalkoholbruknb_NO
dc.subjectalkoholbruk i arbeidslivetnb_NO
dc.subjectforebyggingnb_NO
dc.subjectoccupational health servicesnb_NO
dc.titleCurrent practices and perceived implementation barriers for working with alcohol prevention in occupational health services: The WIRUS OHS studynb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s). 2019nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medical disciplines: 700::Health sciences: 800nb_NO
dc.source.volume14nb_NO
dc.source.journalSubstance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policynb_NO
dc.source.issue30nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13011-019-0217-2
dc.identifier.cristin1705481
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 260640nb_NO
cristin.unitcode217,13,1,0
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for folkehelse
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal