Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSandberg, Mårten
dc.contributor.authorHyldmo, Per Kristian
dc.contributor.authorKongstad, Poul
dc.contributor.authorFriesgaard, Kristian D.
dc.contributor.authorRaatiniemi, Lasse
dc.contributor.authorLarsen, Robert
dc.contributor.authorMagnusson, Vidar
dc.contributor.authorRognås, Leif Kåre
dc.contributor.authorKurola, Jouni
dc.contributor.authorRehn, Marius
dc.contributor.authorVist, Gunn Elisabeth
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-15T14:17:13Z
dc.date.available2021-02-15T14:17:13Z
dc.date.created2021-01-12T14:57:05Z
dc.date.issued2020-11
dc.identifier.citationSandberg, M., Hyldmo, P.K., Kongstad, P. et al. (2020) Ketamine for the treatment of prehospital acute pain: a systematic review of benefit and harm. BMJ Open ;10:e038134.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2728175
dc.description.abstractBackground Few publications have addressed prehospital use of ketamine in analgesic doses. We aimed to assess the effect and safety profile of ketamine compared with other analgesic drugs (or no drug) in adult prehospital patients with acute pain. Methods A systematic review of clinical trials assessing prehospital administration of ketamine in analgesic doses compared with other analgesic drugs or no analgesic treatment in adults. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Epistemonikos from inception until 15 February 2020, including relevant articles in English and Nordic languages. We used the Cochrane and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodologies and exclusively assessed patient-centred outcomes. Two independent authors screened trials for eligibility, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Results We included eight studies (2760 patients). Ketamine was compared with various opioids given alone, and intranasal ketamine given with nitrous oxide was compared with nitrous oxide given alone. Four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and one cluster randomised trial included 699 patients. One prospective cohort included 27 patients and two retrospective cohorts included 2034 patients. Five of the eight studies had high risks of bias. Pain score with ketamine is probably lower than after opioids as demonstrated in a cluster-RCT (308 patients) and a retrospective cohort (158 patients) study, Δvisual analogue scale −0.4 (−0.8 to 0.0) and Δnumeric pain rating scale −3.0 (−3.86 to −2.14), respectively. Ketamine probably leads to less nausea and vomiting (risk ratio (RR) 0.24 (0.11 to 0.52)) but more agitation (RR 7.81 (1.85 to 33)) than opioids. Conclusions This systematic literature review finds that ketamine probably reduces pain more than opioids and with less nausea and vomiting but higher risk of agitation. Risk of bias in included studies is high.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e038134
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectakuttmedisinen_US
dc.subjectsmertestillendeen_US
dc.subjectprehospitale tjenesteren_US
dc.titleKetamine for the treatment of prehospital acute pain: a systematic review of benefit and harmen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750en_US
dc.source.volume10en_US
dc.source.journalBMJ Openen_US
dc.source.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038134
dc.identifier.cristin1869946
dc.source.articlenumber038134en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal