Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBerg, Siv Hilde
dc.contributor.authorO’Hara, Jane
dc.contributor.authorShortt, Marie Therese
dc.contributor.authorThune, Henriette
dc.contributor.authorBrønnick, Kolbjørn Kallesten
dc.contributor.authorLungu, Daniel Adrian
dc.contributor.authorRøislien, Jo
dc.contributor.authorWiig, Siri
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-06T07:50:40Z
dc.date.available2021-08-06T07:50:40Z
dc.date.created2021-08-01T14:04:29Z
dc.date.issued2021-07
dc.identifier.citationBerg, S.H., O'Hara, J.K., Shortt, M.T., et al. (2021) Health authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review. BMC Public Health, 21, 1401en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2766654
dc.description.abstractBackground Responses from the H1N1 swine flu pandemic and the recent COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic provide an opportunity for insight into the role of health authorities’ ways of communicating health risk information to the public. We aimed to synthesise the existing evidence regarding different modes of communication used by health authorities in health risk communication with the public during a pandemic. Methods We conducted a rapid scoping review. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for publications in English from January 2009 through October 2020, covering both the full H1N1 pandemic and the response phase during the COVID-19 pandemic. The search resulted in 1440 records, of which 48 studies met our eligibility criteria. Results The present review identified studies across a broad interdisciplinary field of health risk communication. The majority focused on the H1N1 pandemic and the COVID-19 pandemic. A content analysis of the studies identified three categories for modes of communication: i) communication channels, ii) source credibility and iii) how the message is communicated. The identified studies on social media focused mainly on content and engagement, while studies on the effect of the use of social media and self-protective behaviour were lacking. Studies on the modes of communication that take the diversity of receivers in the field into account are lacking. A limited number of studies of health authorities’ use of graphic and audio-visual means were identified, yet these did not consider/evaluate creative communication choices. Conclusion Experimental studies that investigate the effect of health authorities’ videos and messages on social media platforms and self-protective behaviour are needed. More studies are needed across the fields of health risk communication and media studies, including visual communication, web design, video and digital marketing, at a time when online digital communication is central to reaching the public.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12889-021-11468-3.pdf
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectpandemien_US
dc.subjectpandemicen_US
dc.subjecthelsekommunikasjonen_US
dc.subjecthealthcare communicationen_US
dc.subjectrisk communicationen_US
dc.subjectrisikokommunikasjonen_US
dc.titleHealth authorities’ health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping reviewen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s). 2021en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social sciences: 200en_US
dc.source.pagenumber23en_US
dc.source.volume21en_US
dc.source.journalBMC Public Healthen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-021-11468-3
dc.identifier.cristin1923265
dc.relation.projectTrond Mohn stiftelse: TMS2020TMT10en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal