Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMyrseth, Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorNymo, Linn Såve
dc.contributor.authorGjessing, Petter Fosse
dc.contributor.authorKørner, Hartwig
dc.contributor.authorKvaløy, Jan Terje
dc.contributor.authorNorderval, Stig
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T12:59:09Z
dc.date.available2021-11-03T12:59:09Z
dc.date.created2021-08-27T15:50:40Z
dc.date.issued2021-08
dc.identifier.citationMyrseth, E., Nymo, L.S., Gjessing, P.F. et al. (2021) Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study. Surgical Endoscopyen_US
dc.identifier.issn0930-2794
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2827628
dc.description.abstractBackground Conversion from laparoscopic to open access colorectal surgery is associated with a poorer postoperative outcome. The aim of this study was to assess conversion rates and outcomes after standard laparoscopic rectal resection (LR) and robotic laparoscopic rectal resection (RR). Methods A national 5-year cohort study utilizing prospectively recorded data on patients who underwent elective major laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Data were retrieved from the Norwegian Registry for Gastrointestinal Surgery and from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Registry. Primary end point was conversion rate. Secondary end points were postoperative complications within 30 days and histopathological results. Chi-square test, two-sided T test, and Mann–Whitney U test were used for univariable analyses. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the relations between different predictors and outcomes, and propensity score matching was performed to address potential treatment assignment bias. Results A total of 1284 patients were included, of whom 375 underwent RR and 909 LR. Conversion rate was 8 out of 375 (2.1%) for RR compared with 87 out of 909 (9.6%) for LR (p < 0.001). RR was associated with reduced risk for conversion compared with LR (aOR 0.22, 95% CI 0.10–0.46). There were no other outcome differences between RR and LR. Factors associated with increased risk for conversion were male gender, severe cardiac disease and BMI > 30. Conversion was associated with higher rates of major complications (20 out of 95 (21.2%) vs 135 out of 1189 (11.4%) p = 0.005), reoperations (13 out of 95 (13.7%) vs 93 out of 1189 (7.1%) p = 0.020), and longer hospital stay (median 8 days vs 6 days, p = 0.001). Conclusion Conversion rate was lower with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy. Conversions were associated with higher rates of postoperative complications.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Nature Switzerland AGen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectkirurgien_US
dc.subjectkolorektal kirurgien_US
dc.subjectlaparoskopien_US
dc.subjectpostoperative komplikasjoneren_US
dc.titleLower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2021en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Gasteroenterologisk kirurgi: 781en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-11en_US
dc.source.journalSurgical Endoscopyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00464-021-08681-x
dc.identifier.cristin1929397
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal