dc.contributor.author | Bourrier, Mathilde | |
dc.contributor.author | Deml, Michael J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-04T06:52:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-04T06:52:03Z | |
dc.date.created | 2023-01-02T17:53:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bourrier, M. S., & Deml, M. J. (2022). The Legacy of the Pandemic Preparedness Regime: An Integrative Review. International Journal of Public Health, 286. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1661-8556 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3040801 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The global response to COVID-19 inherited a long history of preparedness features pertaining to various threats, including bioterrorism, (re)-emerging infectious diseases, and pandemics. We describe the evolution of pandemic preparedness frameworks, before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: We conducted an integrative literature review of publicly available documents, including grey and scientific literature, on pandemic preparedness frameworks. We relied on social science literature as a main source and used search keywords: pandemic preparedness, H1N1, COVID-19, “whole-of-society”/“whole-of-community.”
Results: The H1N1 pandemic (2009–2010) tested pandemic preparedness frameworks. Lessons-learned reports concluded that the global H1N1 response were too strong and unnecessarily alarming. Such critiques, pandemic fatigue, and budgetary cuts post-2008 explain lack of preparedness for COVID-19. Critiques culminated in a shift towards a “whole-of-society” approach to health crises, although its uptake has not been ideal.
Conclusion: Traditional preparedness regime limits arose again during the COVID-19 pandemic. The “whole-of-society” approach was not fully deployed in COVID-19 responses. A “whole-of-organizations” approach could be designed, ensuring that countries consider local organizations’ potential to partake in containing infectious disease and counter undesirable side-effects of non-pharmaceutical measures. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Frontiers | en_US |
dc.rights | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.title | The Legacy of the Pandemic Preparedness Regime: An Integrative Review | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | The Legacy of the Pandemic Preparedness Regime: An Integrative Review | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | The author | en_US |
dc.subject.nsi | VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700 | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 67 | en_US |
dc.source.journal | International Journal of Public Health | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604961 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 2099153 | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |