Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBerg, Siv Hilde
dc.contributor.authorShortt, Marie Therese
dc.contributor.authorRøislien, Jo
dc.contributor.authorLungu, Daniel Adrian
dc.contributor.authorThune, Henriette
dc.contributor.authorWiig, Siri
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-05T13:52:29Z
dc.date.available2023-01-05T13:52:29Z
dc.date.created2022-10-03T11:30:41Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBerg, S. H., Shortt, M. T., Røislien, J., Lungu, D. A., Thune, H., & Wiig, S. (2022). Key topics in pandemic health risk communication: A qualitative study of expert opinions and knowledge.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3041309
dc.description.abstractBackground Science communication can provide people with more accurate information on pandemic health risks by translating complex scientific topics into language that helps people make more informed choices on how to protect themselves and others. During pandemics, experts in medicine, science, public health, and communication are important sources of knowledge for science communication. This study uses the COVID-19 pandemic to explore these experts’ opinions and knowledge of what to communicate to the public during a pandemic. The research question is: What are the key topics to communicate to the public about health risks during a pandemic? Method We purposively sampled 13 experts in medicine, science, public health, and communication for individual interviews, with a range of different types of knowledge of COVID-19 risk and communication at the national, regional and hospital levels in Norway. The interview transcripts were coded and analysed inductively in a qualitative thematic analysis. Results The study’s findings emphasise three central topics pertaining to communication about pandemic health risk during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway: 1) how the virus enters the human body and generates disease; 2) how to protect oneself and others from being infected; and 3) pandemic health risk for the individual and the society. Conclusion The key topics emerging from the expert interviews relate to concepts originating from multiple disciplinary fields, and can inform frameworks for interprofessional communication about health risks during a pandemic. The study highlights the complexity of communicating pandemic messages, due to scientific uncertainty, fear of risk amplification, and heterogeneity in public health and scientific literacy. The study contributes with insight into the complex communication processes of pandemic health risk communication.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPLOSen_US
dc.relation.urifile:///C:/Users/2912882/Downloads/journal.pone.0275316.pdf
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleKey topics in pandemic health risk communication: A qualitative study of expert opinions and knowledgeen_US
dc.title.alternativeKey topics in pandemic health risk communication: A qualitative study of expert opinions and knowledgeen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThe authoren_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700en_US
dc.source.volume17en_US
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.source.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0275316
dc.identifier.cristin2057780
dc.relation.projectSHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare: 5091en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal