Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorTrimmel, Helmut
dc.contributor.authorEgger, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorDoppler, Reinhard
dc.contributor.authorPimiskern, Mathias
dc.contributor.authorVoelckel, Wolfgang Georg Cornelius
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-10T14:01:51Z
dc.date.available2023-01-10T14:01:51Z
dc.date.created2022-05-11T08:32:07Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationTrimmel, H., Egger, A., Doppler, R., Pimiskern, M., & Voelckel, W. G. (2022). Usability and effectiveness of inhaled methoxyflurane for prehospital analgesia-a prospective, observational study. BMC Emergency Medicine, 22(1), 1-9.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-227X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3042436
dc.description.abstractBackground Pain relief in the prehospital setting is often insufficient, as the administration of potent intravenous analgesic drugs is mostly reserved to physicians. In Australia, inhaled methoxyflurane has been in routine use by paramedics for decades, but experience in Central European countries is lacking. Thus, we aimed to assess whether user friendliness and effectiveness of inhaled methoxyflurane as sole analgesic match the specific capabilities of local ground and air-based EMS systems in Austria. Methods Observational study in adult trauma patients (e.g. dislocations, fracture or low back pain following minor trauma) with moderate to severe pain (numeric rating scale [NRS] ≥4). Included patients received a Penthrop® inhaler containing 3 mL of methoxyflurane (maximum use 30 min). When pain relief was considered insufficient (NRS reduction < 3 after 10 min), intravenous analgesics were administered by an emergency physician. The primary endpoint was effectiveness of methoxyflurane as sole analgesic for transport of patients. Secondary endpoints were user friendliness (EMS personell), time to pain relief, vital parameters, side effects, and satisfaction of patients. Results Median numeric pain rating was 8.0 (7.0–8.0) in 109 patients. Sufficient analgesia (reduction of NRS ≥3) was achieved by inhaled methoxyflurane alone in 67 patients (61%). The analgesic effect was progressively better with increasing age. Side effects were frequent (n = 58, 53%) but mild. User satisfaction was scored as very good when pain relief was sufficient, but fair in patients without benefit. Technical problems were observed in 16 cases (14.7%), mainly related to filling of the inhaler. In every fifth use, the fruity smell of methoxyflurane was experienced as unpleasant. No negative effects on vital signs were observed. Conclusion In prehospital use, inhaled methoxyflurane as sole analgesic is effective for transport of trauma patients (62%) with moderate to severe pain. Older patients benefit especially from inhaled methoxyflurane. Side effects are mild and vital parameters unaffected. Thus, inhaled methoxyflurane could be a valuable device for non-physician EMS personnel rescue services also in the central Europe region.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleUsability and effectiveness of inhaled methoxyflurane for prehospital analgesia - a prospective, observational studyen_US
dc.title.alternativeUsability and effectiveness of inhaled methoxyflurane for prehospital analgesia - a prospective, observational studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThe authoren_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700en_US
dc.source.volume22en_US
dc.source.journalBMC Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12873-021-00565-6
dc.identifier.cristin2023274
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal