Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorJeppesen, Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorCuevas-Østrem, Mathias
dc.contributor.authorGram-Knutsen, Cathrine
dc.contributor.authorUleberg, Oddvar
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-08T08:12:09Z
dc.date.available2023-02-08T08:12:09Z
dc.date.created2020-05-25T13:01:02Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationJeppesen, E., Cuevas-Østrem, M., Gram-Knutsen, C., & Uleberg, O. (2020). Undertriage in trauma: an ignored quality indicator?. Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 28, 1-3.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1757-7241
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3049095
dc.description.abstractBackground Early identification of life-threatening injuries is essential to reduce morbidity and mortality in trauma patients. Failure to detect severe injury may cause delayed diagnosis and therapeutic interventions and is associated with increased morbidity. A national trauma system will contribute to ensure the optimal care for seriously injured patients throughout the treatment chain by, among other things, defining a sensitive triage tool for identifying severe injury and contribute to correct treatment destination. In 2017, a National trauma plan was implemented in Norway and several quality indicators were recommended to ensure an evaluation of potential gaps between achieved and desired quality, and thereby highlighting areas with potential for quality improvement. With this commentary, we want to draw attention to, what we believe is, an ignoring of an important quality indicator: undertriage in trauma. Main body Severely injured patients not met by a trauma team is commonly referred to as undertriage. An undertriage rate below 5 % is an internationally recognized quality indicator in trauma care and is emphasized in the Norwegian national trauma plan. However, whether hospitals measure and report data about undertriage, have received little attention. Therefore, a national survey was performed among Norwegian hospitals, where thirty-seven of forty trauma receiving hospitals contributed. The results of the survey showed that only half of Norwegian trauma hospitals were capable of providing these data. The results of this survey show that currently the national trauma system is not equipped to obtain important data on an important and specific quality indicator. An ongoing discussion at a national level is how to define severe injury, which may alter future definitions on undertriage. Conclusions Knowledge of undertriage in trauma is important to enhance patient safety, increase the precision of the triage tool and provide valuable learning information to individual hospitals and prehospital services. Currently only half of Norwegian hospitals who receive trauma patients report undertriage rates and unfortunately, only few hospital administrators request these data.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleUndertriage in Trauma: An Ignored Quality Indicator?en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThe authorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700en_US
dc.source.volume34en_US
dc.source.journalScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.source.issue28en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13049-020-00729-6
dc.identifier.cristin1812441
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal