Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHusebø, Sissel Iren Eikeland
dc.contributor.authorOlden, Mona
dc.contributor.authorPedersen, Malinn
dc.contributor.authorPorthun, Jan
dc.contributor.authorBallangrud, Randi
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T13:16:27Z
dc.date.available2023-03-15T13:16:27Z
dc.date.created2022-12-07T08:48:51Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationHusebø, S. E., Olden, M., Pedersen, M., Porthun, J., & Balllangrud, R. (2022). Translation and Psychometric Testing of the Norwegian Version of the “Patients’ Perspectives of Surgical Safety Questionnaire”. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1089-9472
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3058463
dc.description.abstractPurpose To translate the Patients’ Perspectives of Surgical Safety (PPSS) questionnaire into Norwegian and to test it for structural validity and internal consistency. Design This is a methodological study. Methods The original 20-item PPSS questionnaire was translated into Norwegian using a model of translation-back translation. We assessed content validity via a pretest with 20 surgical patients. A sample of 218 surgical patients in a university hospital in Norway completed the PPSS questionnaire. Psychometric analysis included item characteristics, and structural validity was evaluated by an exploratory factor analysis. Internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach's alpha. Findings We successfully translated and adapted the Norwegian PPSS questionnaire. Completion rate was 74%. Missing values were less than 5% and all 20 items had a high skewness (≥15 %) ranging from 52.8% to 95.9%. The exploratory factor analysis yielded two significant factors that explained 45.15% of variance. The Cronbach's alpha for Factor 1 “Team interaction safety” was 0.88 and for Factor 2 “Patient's ID safety”, 0.82. Overall, most patients reported a high sense of surgical safety. Conclusions The first Norwegian version of the PPSS measuring surgical patients’ perception shows promising psychometric properties regarding structural validity and internal consistency. However, future research on PPSS should provide an examination of construct validity, validation and testing in other populations of surgical patients. To improve safety of the surgical trajectory, it is necessary to pay more attention to patients’ perceptions of surgical safety.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleTranslation and psychometric testing of the Norwegian version of the “Patients’ Perspectives of Surgical Safety Questionnaire”en_US
dc.title.alternativeTranslation and psychometric testing of the Norwegian version of the “Patients’ Perspectives of Surgical Safety Questionnaire”en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThe authorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700en_US
dc.source.pagenumber9en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Perianesthesia Nursingen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jopan.2022.08.013
dc.identifier.cristin2089800
dc.relation.projectSHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare: 5091en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal