Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWiig, Siri
dc.contributor.authorHaraldseid-Driftland, Cecilie
dc.contributor.authorDombestein, Heidi
dc.contributor.authorLyng, Hilda Bø
dc.contributor.authorRee, Eline
dc.contributor.authorFagerdal, Birte
dc.contributor.authorSchibevaag, Lene
dc.contributor.authorGuise, Veslemøy
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-03T11:33:54Z
dc.date.available2023-04-03T11:33:54Z
dc.date.created2022-11-11T01:07:59Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationWiig, S., Haraldseid-Driftland, C., Dombestein, H., Lyng, H.B., Ree, E., Fagerdal, B., Schibevaag, L., & Guise, V. (2022). Backstage researching resilience researchers – dilemmas and principles for data collection in the resilience in healthcare research program. International Journal of Health Governance.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2059-4631
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3061798
dc.description.abstractPurpose Resilience in healthcare is fundamental for what constitutes quality in healthcare. To understand healthcare resilience, resilience research needs a multilevel perspective, diverse research designs, and taking advantage of different data sources. However, approaching resilience researchers as a data source is a new approach within this field and needs careful consideration to ensure that research is trustworthy and ethically sound. The aim of this short “backstage” general review paper is to give a snapshot of how the Resilience in Healthcare (RiH) research program identified and dealt with potential methodological and ethical challenges in researching researcher colleagues. Design/methodology/approach The authors first provide an overview of the main challenges and benefits from the literature on researching researcher colleagues. Second, the authors demonstrate how this literature was used to guide strategies and principles adopted in the RiH research process. Findings The paper describes established principles and a checklist for data collection and analysis to overcome potential dilemmas and challenges to ensure trustworthiness and transparency in the process. Originality/value Mining the knowledge and experience of resilience researchers is fundamental for taking the research field to the next step, and furthermore an approach that is relevant across different research fields. This paper provides guidance on how other research projects can approach researcher colleagues in similar ways to gain new insight, build theory and advance their research field based on insider competence.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherEmeralden_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleBackstage Researching Resilience Researchers – Dilemmas and Principles for Data collection in the Resilience in Healthcare Research Programen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThe authorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700en_US
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Health Governanceen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/IJHG-07-2022-0068
dc.identifier.cristin2072126
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 275367en_US
dc.relation.projectSHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare: 5091en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal