Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRana, Sharara-Chami
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, Ulmer
dc.contributor.authorZavi, Lakissian
dc.contributor.authorElla, Scott
dc.contributor.authorHonein-Abou Haidar, Gladys
dc.contributor.authorDieckmann, Gerhard Peter
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-26T11:13:08Z
dc.date.available2023-06-26T11:13:08Z
dc.date.created2023-04-20T09:45:31Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationRana, S. C., Francis, U., Zavi, L., Ella, S., Honein-Abou Haidar, G., & Peter, D. (2023). Cultural differences in simulation debriefing: A qualitative analysis. Heliyon, 9(4).en_US
dc.identifier.issn2405-8440
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3073204
dc.description.abstractContext Simulation is a social practice impacted by norms, values, and beliefs. We seek to explore the relationship between cultural factors and participant behaviour patterns as perceived by debriefers during healthcare simulation debriefings. Our research question focuses on elucidating factors that influence debreifing dynamics between and among debriefers and learners according to Hofstede's cultural dimension: the Power Distance Index. Methods and materials The study employed inductive qualitative analysis following Braun and Clark's 6-step approach to explore debriefers' perceived barriers to discussing non-technical skills including closed-loop communication, situational awareness, and cultural aspects of healthcare simulation debriefing. This study is a complementation to previously published quantitative paper, the qualitative findings are derived from the third section of the interview guide developed by the authors which focused on aspects of the debriefing such as debriefers' perceptions of participant familiarity with non-technical skills and cultural sensitivity. Findings The responses of 57 debriefers from 26 countries were analysed; 36 (64%) of whom practiced simulation in low power distance index (PDI) countries and 31 (36%) practiced in high PDI countries. We identified three major themes: I. Group dynamics, encompassing challenges of hierarchy, ‘speaking up’, fear of ‘losing face’ and ‘judgement’. II. Conceptual clarity about debriefing medical/technical content and the challenges of ‘language’ and III. Institutional ‘skepticism’ toward simulation as a relatively new method of teaching in many parts of the world. Insights The findings confirm the social nature of simulation debriefings, where the interactions are guided by motivations and rules, and where more variability can be found within a culture than between cultures. Acknowledging these differences could lead to cultivating new integrative perspectives for all levels of the healthcare system.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCultural differences in simulation debriefing: A qualitative analysisen_US
dc.title.alternativeCultural differences in simulation debriefing: A qualitative analysisen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holderThe authorsen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200en_US
dc.source.volume9en_US
dc.source.journalHeliyonen_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14904
dc.identifier.cristin2142017
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal