• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Universitetet i Stavanger
  • Faculty of Science and Technology
  • Department of Mechanical and Structural Engineering and Materials Science (TN-IMBM)
  • Studentoppgaver (TN-IKM / TN-IMBM)
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Universitetet i Stavanger
  • Faculty of Science and Technology
  • Department of Mechanical and Structural Engineering and Materials Science (TN-IMBM)
  • Studentoppgaver (TN-IKM / TN-IMBM)
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Module construction of multistory buildings in Norway: A comparative study on limitations, structural performance, cost and serviceability

Ree, Marius
Bachelor thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
no.uis:inspera:232787794:233101341.pdf (3.495Mb)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3136864
Date
2024
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Studentoppgaver (TN-IKM / TN-IMBM) [1361]
Abstract
Modular construction focuses on making prefabricated modules and elements with

preinstalled services in order to reduce the construction time, whilst also maintaining the

structural performance and safety of the building. Though this have not been used much

in Norway, it can be observed from other countries that this method has many advantages

and disadvantages. To name a few, the construction time is faster, the cost can be reduced,

inventory spacing can be managed more easily, labour cost can be reduced, labour safety

can be improved, while still satisfying the structural requirements for the job. Furthermore,

modular construction may be a more affordable solution to the housing crises in

underdeveloped countries and a solution for cheaper student housing. This paper focuses

on comparing the structural performance, cost, advantages, disadvantages, limitations and

serviceability between traditional cast-in-place concrete elements, precast elements and

prefabricate modules.
 
Modular construction focuses on making prefabricated modules and elements with

preinstalled services in order to reduce the construction time, whilst also maintaining the

structural performance and safety of the building. Though this have not been used much

in Norway, it can be observed from other countries that this method has many advantages

and disadvantages. To name a few, the construction time is faster, the cost can be reduced,

inventory spacing can be managed more easily, labour cost can be reduced, labour safety

can be improved, while still satisfying the structural requirements for the job. Furthermore,

modular construction may be a more affordable solution to the housing crises in

underdeveloped countries and a solution for cheaper student housing. This paper focuses

on comparing the structural performance, cost, advantages, disadvantages, limitations and

serviceability between traditional cast-in-place concrete elements, precast elements and

prefabricate modules.
 
Publisher
UIS

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit