Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNieder, Carsten
dc.contributor.authorHaukland, Ellinor Christin
dc.contributor.authorMannsåker, Bård
dc.contributor.authorDalhaug, Astrid
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-17T11:41:06Z
dc.date.available2024-07-17T11:41:06Z
dc.date.created2023-04-20T12:39:33Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationNieder, C., Haukland, E. C., Mannsåker, B., & Dalhaug, A. (2023). The LabPS score: Inexpensive, Fast, and Site-agnostic Survival Prediction. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 46(4), 178-182.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0277-3732
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3141836
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To provide a widely applicable, blood-biomarker-based and performance-status-based prognostic model, which predicts the survival of patients undergoing palliative non-brain radiotherapy. This model has already been examined in a cohort of patients treated for brain metastases and performed well. Methods: This was a retrospective single-institution analysis of 375 patients, managed with non-ablative radiotherapy to extracranial targets, such as bone, lung, or lymph nodes. Survival was stratified by LabPS score, a model including serum hemoglobin, platelets, albumin, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, and performance status. Zero, 0.5, or 1 point was assigned and the final point sum calculated. A higher point sum indicates shorter survival. Results: The LabPS score predicted overall survival very well (median 0.6 to 26.5 mo, 3-month rate 0% to 100%, 1-year rate 0% to 89%), P=0.0001. However, the group with the poorest prognosis (4.5 points) was very small. Most patients with comparably short survival or radiotherapy administered in the last month of life had a lower point sum. Additional prognostic factors, such as liver metastases, opioid analgesic use, and/or corticosteroid medication, were identified. Conclusions: If busy clinicians prefer a general prognostic model rather than a panel of separate diagnosis-specific/target-specific scores, they may consider validating the LabPS score in their own practice. In resource-constrained settings, inexpensive standard blood tests may be preferable over imaging-derived prognostic information. Just like other available scores, the LabPS cannot identify all patients with very short survival.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Health, Inc.en_US
dc.subjectkreften_US
dc.subjectoverlevelsesrateren_US
dc.titleThe LabPS score: Inexpensive, Fast, and Site-agnostic Survival Predictionen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Onkologi: 762en_US
dc.source.pagenumber178-182en_US
dc.source.volume46en_US
dc.source.journalAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncologyen_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/COC.0000000000000987
dc.identifier.cristin2142118
dc.relation.projectSHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare: 5091en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel