Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorInderberg, Tor Håkon Jackson
dc.contributor.authorRuus, Jakob Pfefferkorn
dc.coverage.spatialNorwaynb_NO
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-13T10:16:46Z
dc.date.available2019-10-13T10:16:46Z
dc.date.issued2019-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2621763
dc.descriptionMaster's thesis in Energy, environment and societynb_NO
dc.description.abstractIn 2010, Norway had a goal to attain 3 TWh of windpower that was not reached. Recent years, the Norwegian windpower generation has increased dramatically, with yet projects to be built. Whereas almost 4 TWh was produced in 2018 and a planned theoretical production of about 13 TWh in total. But, as the windpower generation increase despite that there are no set goals, this begs the question of why Norway need windpower and what its role is in their electricity system? This thesis is a discourse analysis of relevant actors’ main perspectives on what role windpower ought to have in the Norwegian electricity system. The main findings are two derived discourses. The perspectives that has been retrieved from the data collection, that advocates windpower are visions on electrification processes, increased exportation of electricity, and local value creation. Perspectives that advocates against windpower are windpower’s ruining of untouched nature in terms of human experiences such as outdoor life and tourism industry, and degrading of nature in terms of biodiversity, fauna, flora, etc. This thesis takes an argumentative approach and establish storylines to investigate the argumentative structures. The content is interpreted as well as how actors gain support for their view and how it influences decision-makers. The discourses are called “Opportunism with windpower” and “Destruction with windpower”. It turns out as a struggle between climate and the natural environment, hence a paradoxical ‘green-on-green’ battle. Most discursive authority is found in “Opportunism with windpower”, but an increasing challenge for discursive authority is opposed by “Destruction with windpower”. An unanimity is found between the discourses, that emissions must be reduced. Should windpower be part of the Norwegian electricity system, its role is mainly to reduce emission. But, whether windpower proposes the quality to fill this role or if windpower’s interference in nature is too severe compared to a limited contribution in mitigating climate change, remains a struggle.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherUniversity of Stavanger, Norwaynb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMasteroppgave/UIS-SV-IMS/2019;
dc.subjectdiskursanalysenb_NO
dc.subjectvindkraftnb_NO
dc.subjectdiscourse analysisnb_NO
dc.subjectwind powernb_NO
dc.subjectelectricity systemnb_NO
dc.subjectstorylinesnb_NO
dc.subjectenergynb_NO
dc.subjectenvironmentnb_NO
dc.subjectsocietynb_NO
dc.subjectargumentative approachnb_NO
dc.subjectenerginb_NO
dc.titleA 'green-on-green' paradox - Discursive struggles of what role windpower ought to have in the Norwegian electricity systemnb_NO
dc.typeMaster thesisnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200nb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Technology: 500::Environmental engineering: 610nb_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Master's theses (SV-IMKS/IMS) [620]
    Masteroppgaver i Endringsledelse / Masteroppgaver i Kunst og kulturvitenskap / Masteroppgaver i Samfunnssikkerhet / Masteroppgaver i Dokumentarproduksjon

Show simple item record